|
|
Selling non-seaworthy sea kayaks
Last post Tue, Jun 03 2008, 17:41 by nickJ. 7 replies.
-
Thu, May 29 2008, 2:30 |
-
yatesy
-
-

-
Joined on Fri, May 18 2007
-
Whitechapel
-
Posts 239
-
-
|
Selling non-seaworthy sea kayaks
Hi Greg,
During the last club spending review it was proposed that we would sell our non-seaworthy sea kayaks (the likes of the pilots) and use the proceeds along with the budget that was allocated to sea kayaks to purchase some more boats.
Justin, it's great of you to volunteer to help, I suggest that yourself and anyone else who would like to help speak to Nick and find out which boats he thinks are worth keeping and those that can go... ebay can fetch suprisingly good prices even for clapped out old kayaks!
As for the basin sea kayaks... in practice these are available a lot of the time, it's just as we approach a busier time of year for the basin they are needing them a little more often.
If anyone else has any questions please don't hesitate to ask!
Yatesy
Equipment Officer "Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing..."
|
|
-
Thu, May 29 2008, 2:53 |
-
Robby Russell
-
-

-
Joined on Thu, Feb 08 2007
-
Greenwich
-
Posts 153
-
-
|
Re: Thur-29th May: River paddle
Yatesy et al, There are a lot of people who are willing to assist in this matter, but perhaps are reluctant owing to uncertain parameters of authority. It would greatly assist me if you might issue the authority to sell named and identified sea kayaks for x price on the open market so that there might be no confusion about proceeds, etc., and then I will put them on ebay. The authority should be issued by the Committee, preferably in writing. The purchase of the replacement kayaks might also be executed in a similar fashion, but I will need the written assurance from Lars that he will reimburse me £x for replacements on production of the requisite invoice and physical proof of purchase before I can buy anything on my credit card. Cheers!
|
|
-
Thu, May 29 2008, 11:48 |
-
Jon Goodliffe
-
-

-
Joined on Sun, May 07 2006
-
-
Posts 455
-
-
|
Can I suggest that you double check with the basin the boats that are being sold.
1) they might want them
2) they might be basin boats (the only reason I say this is I have noticed in certain posts, some confusion between club and basin boats. for example not all plastic sea kayaks belong to the club.)
I don't paddle sea kayaks but one question people may want to ask themselves is:
If the green pilot cost 200 quid. Whilst not sea worthy, would one rather paddle this, or a dancer or invader when on the Thames?
Whilst not all boats are expedition spec, for the money that might be got for them (ie: sell 2 to get enough money to buy 2/3 of a new one), are they not worth keeping for the river and training, rather than having 1 boat instead of the two & thus having to paddle a dancer?
Perhaps keep the pilots for sea kayak training as they are shorter than many sea kayaks & thus a got transition?
Ultimately it's up to those involved in this process, but as a club (rather than the sea kayak section of the club) are certain boats not useful (ie for training, getting beginners on the river, etc..) even though they cannot be used for sea trips, by hardened sea kayakers? Ultimately the boats belong to the WHOLE club rather than a sub-section of the club.
Just a thought.
Jon
|
|
-
Fri, May 30 2008, 6:31 |
-
Sean
-
-

-
Joined on Mon, May 15 2006
-
Wapping
-
Posts 171
-
-
|
For the first time in a while, I completely agree with our wise former Chairman :)
Jon Goodliffe:
Can I suggest that you double check with the basin the boats that are being sold.
1) they might want them
2) they might be basin boats (the only reason I say this is I have noticed in certain posts, some confusion between club and basin boats. for example not all plastic sea kayaks belong to the club.)
I don't paddle sea kayaks but one question people may want to ask themselves is:
If the green pilot cost 200 quid. Whilst not sea worthy, would one rather paddle this, or a dancer or invader when on the Thames?
Whilst not all boats are expedition spec, for the money that might be got for them (ie: sell 2 to get enough money to buy 2/3 of a new one), are they not worth keeping for the river and training, rather than having 1 boat instead of the two & thus having to paddle a dancer?
Perhaps keep the pilots for sea kayak training as they are shorter than many sea kayaks & thus a got transition?
Ultimately it's up to those involved in this process, but as a club (rather than the sea kayak section of the club) are certain boats not useful (ie for training, getting beginners on the river, etc..) even though they cannot be used for sea trips, by hardened sea kayakers? Ultimately the boats belong to the WHOLE club rather than a sub-section of the club.
Just a thought.
|
|
-
Fri, May 30 2008, 7:31 |
-
Martin K
-
-

-
Joined on Tue, Jun 26 2007
-
Camberwell
-
Posts 310
-
-
|
Jon Goodliffe:If the green pilot cost 200 quid. Whilst not sea worthy, would one rather paddle this, or a dancer or invader when on the Thames?
I can't speak on behalf of the SK Section here, who have been giving some thought to this. However due to shortages I tried a Dancer with Chris practising rescues and rolling (painful thigh bruises for a week after), entertaining yourself and others in the process of trying to do a self rescue into Chris's boat. I have come to following conclusions: practising SK rescues (and other techniques) mainly have to be done in SK boats (emptying an SK is very different to emptying other kayaks). The way they handle is very different. The Thames although often benign, can get rough so needs boats that are designed to cut through waves. The SK boats are longer, therefore faster, someone in a shorter boat might struggle to keep up, or even make headway against a strong current. The course for getting on the Thames is the "Introduction to Sea Kayaking Course" which goes some of the way to preparing people for their 3 Star SK, and I think the majority in the SK section do not see Thames paddling as an end in it's own right (enjoyable as it is), but as a preparation for proper Sea Kayaking and a way to keep fit for this. So the question on boat choice is to use exclusively Sea Kayaks (and their smaller cousins - tourers?), but getting the mix right, so there are more stable and forgiving ones for beginners, roomier ones for the larger paddlers etc.
O London, see Swelling with naval pride, the pride of thee! Wide, deep, unsullied Thames, meandering glides, and bears thy wealth on mild majestic tides.
|
|
-
Fri, May 30 2008, 13:13 |
-
Tue, Jun 03 2008, 5:44 |
-
Martin K
-
-

-
Joined on Tue, Jun 26 2007
-
Camberwell
-
Posts 310
-
-
|
Hi Jon, on the Pilots, I support Nick on the following: nickJ:...the aim is to have a fleet of safe, practical and seaworthy boats - which in my opinion the Pilots are not capable of being part of. The leaky 'bulkheads' allow a flooded cockpit to fill the hatches in only a couple of minutes. This is exactly one of those things that could turn a minor incident into a major one, the problem escalates. The Pilots bolt-on bits fall off or break further making what at first appeared to be a promising, cheap boat, into an impractical, 3nd rate one.
O London, see Swelling with naval pride, the pride of thee! Wide, deep, unsullied Thames, meandering glides, and bears thy wealth on mild majestic tides.
|
|
-
Tue, Jun 03 2008, 17:41 |
-
nickJ
-
-
-
Joined on Fri, May 12 2006
-
-
Posts 230
-
-
|
Hello all of you, particularly those who want to hang on to boats that look like sea kayaks but don't behave the way they should. I understand Jon's argument for keeping boats that let people paddle on the river but some thing like the Pilot is misleading. I'm speaking from direct experience and not some vague idea - the Pilots hatches fill with water when the cockpit is flooded - this is an unpleasant surprise when you try to rescue one. Unlike the Dancer which you know has no bulheads but may have airbags, the Pilot simply fills and because of the bulkheads can't be emptied quickly..pretty much the worst of both worlds. On the river this is simply dangerous. There is nothing wrong with paddling Dancers or Invaders on the river...at least you know what you are getting (i.e. a badly maintaned boat with no footrests that responds to an X rescue). You just don't mix sea kayaks (faster) and general pupose boats (slower). The issue of letting perhaps four extra people get on the river is a red herring - the club is not short of money so just replace the sub-standard boats with passable ones. I am getting weary with the club's reluctance to spend the money we pay it. I was voted sea kayaking rep and am trying to do that job the best way I can - whether or not the club sees fit to limit membership it still does not have enough sea kayaks for the current number of paddlers. This is just silly.
Nick the Younger
|
|
|
|
|